- Saylor criticized Bitcoin proof-of-reserves as risky.
- Saylor’s comments sparked significant backlash.
- Strategy’s stance influences institutional Bitcoin practices.
Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, criticized proof-of-reserves during the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas, stating it poses security risks.
Saylor’s criticism of proof-of-reserves challenges industry norms, impacting transparency practices and potentially influencing other Bitcoin holders’ decisions.
Conference Highlights and Saylor’s Position
At the Bitcoin 2025 conference, Michael Saylor dismissed the idea of proof-of-reserves, calling it a “bad idea” and a “liability.” He argued that disclosing wallet information is an “attack vector.” His stance diverges from industry trends post-FTX collapse.
“It’s a bad idea. If you publish your wallets, that’s an attack vector for hackers, nation-state actors, every type of troll imaginable.” – Michael Saylor, source.
Sir Crypto Tips shares valuable crypto investment advice.
Strategy, holding over 580,000 Bitcoin, is a significant player in the crypto industry. Saylor’s comments resonate widely, given Strategy’s influence as a major corporate Bitcoin holder. His refusal to adopt transparency deviates from the post-FTX trend.
Industry Reactions
Critics immediately reacted to Saylor’s comments. Crypto analyst Toby Cunningham noted Saylor’s stance contradicts the principle of “self custody.” The debate highlights growing tensions about transparency standards in the crypto industry after recent platform collapses.
The implications of Saylor’s statements extend across financial, social, and technological landscapes. Failure to adopt proof-of-reserves might deter investors seeking transparency and trust in the market. The crypto community remains divided over these practices and their perceived risks.
Debates on Current Transparency Practices
Some in the crypto community argue Saylor’s stance reflects outdated thinking. Analysts highlight that proof-of-reserves should not compromise security. Debates continue over whether disclosure impacts trust and whether crypto companies should embrace new transparency measures.
Strategy’s ongoing refusal to disclose wallet information reflects the complex, often contentious dialogue surrounding proof-of-reserves. As transparency practices evolve, key industry players will likely reassess their positions in light of technological advances and market demands.
